Emerging from the Pandemic: AAIM Recommendations for Internal Medicine Residency and Fellowship Interview Standards

      New standards are needed moving forward to guide residency and fellowship interviews in response to Coalition for Physician Accountability recommendations and dramatic changes in the interview landscape over the past 2 years.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Chretien KC
        • Raj JM
        • Abraham RA
        • et al.
        AAIM Recommendations for the 2020-2021 internal medicine residency application cycle in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
        Am J Med. 2020; 133: 1223-1226
        • Raj JM
        • Lai CJ
        • Higgins S
        • et al.
        AAIM Principles and Recommendations for the 2021-2022 internal medicine residency interview cycle in response to the continued COVID-19 pandemic.
        Am J Med. 2021; 134: 1427-1431
      1. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. AAIM Recommendations for the 2021-2022 internal medicine fellowship application cycle in response to the continued COVID-19 pandemic. Available at: Accessed April 26, 2022.

      2. National Resident Matching Program. 2021 Applicant and Program Director Survey Findings: Impact of the Virtual Experience on the Transition to Residency Research Brief. Available at: Accessed May 23, 2022.

      3. Ponterio J, Levy L, Lakhi N. Evaluation of the virtual interview format for resident recruitment as a result of COVID-19 restrictions: residency program directors’ perspectives [e-pub ahead of print]. Acad Med. Accessed June 20, 2022.

        • Domingo A
        • Rdesinski RE
        • Stenson A
        • et al.
        Virtual residency interviews: applicant perceptions regarding virtual interview effectiveness, advantages, and barriers.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2022; 14: 224-228
      4. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC interview guidance for the 2022-2023 residency cycle. Available at: Accessed May 23, 2022.

        • Rockney D
        • Benson CA
        • Blackburn BG
        • et al.
        Virtual recruitment is here to stay: a survey of id fellowship program directors and matched applicants regarding their 2020 virtual recruitment experiences.
        Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021; 8: ofab383
        • Huppert LA
        • Hsu G
        • Elnachef N
        • et al.
        A single center evaluation of applicant experiences in virtual interviews across eight internal medicine subspecialty fellowship programs.
        Med Educ Online. 2021; 261946237
        • Kamboj AK
        • Chandrasekhara V
        • Simonetto DA
        • et al.
        How we did it: virtual interviews with an eye toward the future.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2021; 116: 1972-1975
      5. Coalition for Physician Accountability. The Coalition for Physician Accountability's undergraduate medical education-graduate medical education review committee (UGRC): recommendations for comprehensive improvement of the UME-GME transition. Available at: Accessed May 23, 2022.

        • Heitkamp NM
        • Snyder AN
        • Ramu A
        • et al.
        Lessons learned: applicant equity and the 2020-2021 virtual interview season.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 1787-1791
        • Donahue LM
        • Morgan HK
        • Peterson WJ
        • et al.
        The carbon footprint of residency interview travel.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2021; 13: 89-94
        • Bernstein D
        • Beshar I.
        The carbon footprint of residency interviews.
        Acad Med. 2021; 96: 932
        • Gallo K
        • Becker R
        • Borin J
        • et al.
        Virtual residency interviews reduce cost and carbon emissions.
        J Urol. 2021; 206: 1353-1355
        • Fung BSC
        • Raiche I
        • Lamb T
        • et al.
        A chance for reform: the environmental impact of travel for general surgery residency interviews.
        Can Med Educ J. 2021; 12: 8-18
        • Huppert LA
        • Santhosh L
        • Babik JM.
        Trends in US internal medicine residency and fellowship applications during the COVID-19 pandemic vs previous years.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4e218199
        • Simmons RP
        • Ortiz J
        • Kisielewski M
        • et al.
        Virtual recruitment: experiences and perspectives of internal medicine program directors.
        Am J Med. 2022; 135: 258-263
      6. Academic Medicine Blog. A new norm: the amplified stress of applying to residency. Available at: Accessed January 9, 2022.

        • Gliatto P
        • Karani R.
        The residency application process: working well, needs fixing, or broken beyond repair?.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2016; 8: 307-310
        • Hopson LR
        • Edens MA
        • Goodrich M
        • et al.
        Calming troubled waters: a narrative review of challenges and potential solutions in the residency interview offer process.
        West J Emerg Med. 2020; 22: 1-6
        • McCain C
        • Kemp B
        • Baier MG
        • et al.
        A framework for the virtual medical interview process: considerations for the applicant and interviewer.
        Ochsner J. 2022; 22: 61-70
        • Alweis R
        • Williams CM
        • Luther VP
        • et al.
        AAIM guidelines for interview and post-interview communication for graduate medical education recruitment.
        Am J Med. 2019; 132: 1106-1111
      7. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. AAIM health disparities collaborative learning community: health disparities toolkit. Available at: Accessed May 10, 2022.

      8. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. Interview and post-interview communication guidelines for GME: resources. Available at: Accessed April 27, 2022.

        • Morgan HK
        • Winkel AG
        • Standiford T
        • et al.
        The case for capping residency interviews.
        J Surg Educ. 2021; 78: 755-762
        • Burk-Rafel J
        • Standiford TC.
        A novel ticket system for capping residency interview numbers: reimagining interviews in the COVID-19 era.
        Acad Med. 2021; 96: 50-55
        • Carmody J
        • Rosman IS
        • Carlson JC
        Application fever: reviewing the causes, costs, and cures for residency application inflation.
        Cureus. 2021; 13: e13804
        • Quillen DA
        • Siatkowski RM
        • Feldon S.
        COVID-19 and the ophthalmology match.
        Ophthalmology. 2021; 128: 181-184
        • Santos-Parker KS
        • Morgan HK
        • Katz NT
        • et al.
        Can standardized dates for interview offers mitigate excessive interviewing?.
        J Surg Educ. 2021; 78: 1091-1096
        • Jardaly A
        • Ponce B
        • Balach T
        • et al.
        Perceptions of the universal interview offer day in the orthopaedic surgery residency interview process.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022; 30: 586-593
        • Hammoud MM
        • Winkel AF
        • Strand EA
        • et al.
        Stakeholder perspectives on standardizing the residency application and interview processes.
        J Surg Educ. 2021; 78: 1103-1110