Advertisement

Elevated NT-proBNP as a cardiovascular disease risk equivalent: Evidence from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

      Abstract

      Background

      It remains unclear whether elevated NT-proBNP can serve as a ‘risk equivalent’ for cardiovascular (CVD) to adults at high cardiovascular risk.

      Methods

      We included 9,789 participants (mean age 63.2 years, 55% women,19.4% Black, 13% with a history of cardiovascular disease) who attended ARIC Visit 4 (1996-1998). We classified participants as having a history of cardiovascular disease at baseline and, among those without cardiovascular disease, we defined categories of NT-proBNP (<125, 125-449, ≥450 pg/mL). We used Cox regression to estimate associations of NTproBNP with incident cardiovascular disease and mortality.

      Results

      Over a median 20.5 years of follow-up, there were 4562 deaths (917 cardiovascular deaths). There were 2817 first events and 806 recurrent events (in those with a history of cardiovascular disease at baseline). Among individuals without a history of cardiovascular disease, those adults with NT-proBNP ≥450 pg/mL had significantly higher risks of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.78, 2.53), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 2.15, 3.97), incident total cardiovascular disease (HR: 2.59, 95%CI: 2.13, 3.16), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.72, 2.80), and heart failure (HR: 3.81, 95% CI: 3.01, 4.81), compared to individuals with NT-proBNP<125 pg/mL. The elevated cardiovascular risk in persons with high NTproBNP and no history of cardiovascular disease was similar to or higher than the risk conferred by a history of cardiovascular disease.

      Conclusions

      Our findings suggest that it might be appropriate to manage adults with NTproBNP ≥450 pg/mL as if they had a history of clinical cardiovascular disease.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Di Angelantonio E
        • Chowdhury R
        • Sarwar N
        • et al.
        B-type natriuretic peptides and cardiovascular risk: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 prospective studies.
        Circulation. 2009; 120: 2177-2187
        • Geng Z
        • Huang L
        • Song M
        • Song Y.
        N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in the general population: A meta-analysis.
        Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 41504
        • Bibbins-Domingo K
        • Gupta R
        • Na B
        • Wu AHB
        • Schiller NB
        • Whooley MA.
        N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), cardiovascular events, and mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease.
        JAMA. 2007; 297: 169-176
        • Willeit P
        • Kaptoge S
        • et al.
        • Natriuretic Peptides Studies Collaboration
        Natriuretic peptides and integrated risk assessment for cardiovascular disease: an individual-participant-data meta-analysis.
        Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016; 4: 840-849
        • Yancy CW
        • Jessup M
        • Bozkurt B
        • Butler J
        • Casey DEJ.
        2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force.
        Circulation. 2013; 128: e240-e327
        • Bozkurt B
        • Coats A
        • Tsutsui H.
        Universal Definition and Classification of Heart Failure.
        J Card Fail. 2021; (S1071-9164(21)00050-6)
        • The ARIC Investigators
        The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators.
        Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129: 687-702
        • Bordicchia M
        • Liu D
        • Amri EZ
        • et al.
        Cardiac natriuretic peptides act via p38 MAPK to induce the brown fat thermogenic program in mouse and human adipocytes.
        J Clin Invest. 2012; 122: 1022-1036
        • Potter LR
        • Abbey-Hosch S
        • Dickey DM.
        Natriuretic peptides, their receptors, and cyclic guanosine monophosphate-dependent signaling functions.
        Endocr Rev. 2006; 27: 47-72
        • Gupta DK
        • Wang TJ.
        Natriuretic peptides and cardiometabolic health.
        Circ J. 2015; 79: 1647
        • Huelsmann M
        • Neuhold S
        • Resl M
        • et al.
        PONTIAC (NT-proBNP selected prevention of cardiac events in a population of diabetic patients without a history of cardiac disease): a prospective randomized controlled trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 1365-1372
        • Brunner-La Rocca HP
        • Eurlings L
        • Richards AM
        • et al.
        Which heart failure patients profit from natriuretic peptide guided therapy? A meta-analysis from individual patient data of randomized trials.
        Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17: 1252-1261
        • Ledwidge M
        • Gallagher J
        • Conlon C
        • et al.
        Natriuretic peptide-based screening and collaborative care for heart failure: the STOP-HF randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2013; 310: 66-74
        • Ledwidge MT
        • O'Connell E
        • Gallagher J
        • et al.
        Cost-effectiveness of natriuretic peptide-based screening and collaborative care: a report from the STOP-HF (St Vincent's Screening TO Prevent Heart Failure) study.
        Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17: 672-679https://doi.org/10.1002/EJHF.286
        • Heidenreich PA
        • Gubens MA
        • Fonarow GC
        • Konstam MA
        • Stevenson LW
        • Shekelle PG.
        Cost-effectiveness of screening with B-type natriuretic peptide to identify patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 1019-1026
        • Nielsen OW
        • McDonagh TA
        • Robb SD
        • Dargie HJ.
        Retrospective analysis of the cost-effectiveness of using plasma brain natriuretic peptide in screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the general population.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 113-120
        • Ponikowski P
        • Voors AA
        • Anker SD
        • et al.
        2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC.
        Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 2129
        • Balion C
        • Santaguida P
        • Hill S
        • et al.
        Testing for BNP and NT-proBNP in the diagnosis and prognosis of heart failure.
        Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006; : 1-147
        • Chow SL
        • Maisel AS
        • Anand I
        • et al.
        Role of Biomarkers for the Prevention, Assessment, and Management of Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
        Circulation. 2017; 135: e1054-e1091
        • Okura Y
        • Urban LH
        • Mahoney DW
        • Jacobsen SJ
        • Rodeheffer RJ.
        Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2004; 57: 1096-1103
        • Heckbert SR
        • Kooperberg C
        • Safford MM
        • et al.
        Comparison of self-report, hospital discharge codes, and adjudication of cardiovascular events in the Women's Health Initiative.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160: 1152-1158