Advertisement

Antiplatelet Agents in Acute ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Published:February 21, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.01.042

      Abstract

      Platelet aggregation and thrombus formation represent the basic mechanism for clinical, electrocardiographic, and biomarker changes consistent with acute coronary syndrome. Various oral and intravenous formulations of platelet function inhibitors have been developed to help decrease platelet aggregation due to acute atherosclerotic plaque rupture. In this article, we review the various mechanisms, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and the key clinical trials related to the platelet inhibitors that form the basis for current recommendations of their use in the ST elevation myocardial infarction guidelines by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The American Journal of Medicine
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nording H
        • Baron L
        • Langer HF
        Platelets as therapeutic targets to prevent atherosclerosis.
        Atherosclerosis. 2020; 307: 97-108
        • Vorchheimer DA
        • Becker R
        Platelets in atherothrombosis.
        Mayo Clin Proc. 2006; 81: 59-68
        • Salasidis R
        • Padjen AL
        • Fleiszer D
        Patient management in the ICU: the PDB System.
        Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991; : 990-992
      1. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group.
        Lancet. 1988; 2: 349-360
        • Sabatine MS
        • Cannon CP
        • Gibson CM
        • et al.
        Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin and fibrinolytic therapy for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation.
        N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1179-1189
        • Chen ZM
        • Jiang LX
        • Chen YP
        • et al.
        Addition of clopidogrel to aspirin in 45,852 patients with acute myocardial infarction: randomised placebo-controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2005; 366: 1607-1621
        • Wiviott SD
        • Braunwald E
        • McCabe CH
        • et al.
        Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 2001-2015
        • Udell JA
        • Braunwald E
        • Antman EM
        • Murphy SA
        • Montalescot G
        • Wiviott SD
        Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention: a TRITON-TIMI 38 subgroup analysis (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition with Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38).
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 604-612
        • Husted S
        • Emanuelsson H
        • Heptinstall S
        • Sandset PM
        • Wickens M
        • Peters G
        Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the oral reversible P2Y12 antagonist AZD6140 with aspirin in patients with atherosclerosis: a double-blind comparison to clopidogrel with aspirin.
        Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1038-1047
        • Berwanger O
        • Lopes RD
        • Moia DDF
        • et al.
        Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients With STEMI treated with fibrinolysis: TREAT trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 2819-2828
        • Hamilos M
        • Kanakakis J
        • Anastasiou I
        • et al.
        Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with STEMI treated with thrombolysis: the MIRTOS trial.
        EuroIntervention. 2021; 16: 1163-1169
        • Aytekin A
        • Ndrepepa G
        • Neumann F-J
        • et al.
        Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Circulation. 2020; 142: 2329-2337
        • Berger JS
        • Stebbins A
        • Granger CB
        • et al.
        Initial aspirin dose and outcome among ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy.
        Circulation. 2008; 117: 192-199
        • Mehta SR
        • Tanguya J-F
        • Eikelboom JW
        • et al.
        Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial.
        Lancet. 2010; 376: 1233-1243
        • Serebruany VL
        • Steinhubl SR
        • Berger PB
        • et al.
        Analysis of risk of bleeding complications after different doses of aspirin in 192,036 patients enrolled in 31 randomized controlled trials.
        Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 1218-1222
        • Yu J
        • Mehran R
        • Dangas GD
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of high- versus low-dose aspirin after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 1231-1238
        • Xian Y
        • Wang TY
        • McCoy LA
        • et al.
        Association of discharge aspirin dose with outcomes after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the treatment with ADP receptor inhibitors: longitudinal assessment of treatment patterns and events after acute coronary syndrome (TRANSLATE-ACS) study.
        Circulation. 2015; 132: 174-181
        • O'Gara PT
        • Kushner FG
        • Deborah DA
        • et al.
        2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
        Circulation. 2013; 127: e362-e425
        • Caplain H
        • Donat F
        • Gaud C
        • Necciari J
        Pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel.
        Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999; 25: 25-28
        • Lins R
        • Broekhuysen J
        • Necciari J
        • Deroubaix X
        Pharmacokinetic profile of 14C-labeled clopidogrel.
        Semin Thromb Hemost. 1999; 25: 29-33
        • Wallentin L
        P2Y(12) inhibitors: differences in properties and mechanisms of action and potential consequences for clinical use.
        Eur Heart J. 2009; 30: 1964-1977
        • Mega JL
        • Simon T
        • Collet J-P
        • et al.
        Reduced-function CYP2C19 genotype and risk of adverse clinical outcomes among patients treated with clopidogrel predominantly for PCI: a meta-analysis.
        JAMA. 2010; 304: 1821-1830
        • Nguyen TA
        • Diodati JG
        • Pharand C
        Resistance to clopidogrel: a review of the evidence.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 45: 1157-1164
        • Collet JP
        • Cuisset T
        • Rangé G
        • et al.
        Bedside monitoring to adjust antiplatelet therapy for coronary stenting.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 2100-2109
        • Klein MD
        • Williams AK
        • Lee CR
        • Stouffer GA
        Clinical utility of CYP2C19 genotyping to guide antiplatelet therapy in patients with an acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019; 39: 647-652
        • Price MJ
        • Berger PB
        • Teirstein PS
        • et al.
        Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2011; 305: 1097-1105
        • Brandt JT
        • Payner CD
        • Wiviott SD
        • et al.
        A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation.
        Am Heart J. 2007; 153 (66.e9-16)
        • Ernest 2nd, CS
        • Small DS
        • Rohatagi S
        • et al.
        Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel and clopidogrel in aspirin-treated patients with stable coronary artery disease.
        J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2008; 35: 593-618
        • Storey RF
        • Husted S
        • Harrington RA
        • et al.
        Inhibition of platelet aggregation by AZD6140, a reversible oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist, compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 1852-1856
        • Wallentin L
        • Becker RC
        • Budaj A
        • et al.
        Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1045-1057
        • Motovska Z
        • Hlinomaz O
        • Miklik R
        • et al.
        Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: multicenter randomized PRAGUE-18 study.
        Circulation. 2016; 134: 1603-1612
        • Sabatine MS
        • Cannon CP
        • Gibson CM
        • et al.
        Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytics: the PCI-CLARITY study.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 1224-1232
        • Montalescot G
        • van ‘t Hof AW
        • Lapostolle F
        • et al.
        Prehospital ticagrelor in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 1016-1027
        • Franchi F
        • Rollini F
        • Muñiz-Lopez A
        • Cho JR
        • Angiolillo DJ
        Cangrelor: a review on pharmacology and clinical trial development.
        Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013; 11: 1279-1291
        • Kubica J
        • Kozinski M
        • Navarese EP
        • et al.
        Cangrelor: an emerging therapeutic option for patients with coronary artery disease.
        Curr Med Res Opin. 2014; 30: 813-828
        • Greenbaum AB
        • Grines CL
        • Bittl JA
        • et al.
        Initial experience with an intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a 2-part, phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial.
        Am Heart J. 2006; 151: 689.e1-689.e10
        • Storey RF
        • Oldroyd KG
        • Wilcox RG
        Open multicentre study of the P2T receptor antagonist AR-C69931MX assessing safety, tolerability and activity in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
        Thromb Haemost. 2001; 85: 401-407
        • Angiolillo DJ
        • Capranzano P
        Pharmacology of emerging novel platelet inhibitors.
        Am Heart J. 2008; 156: S10-S15
        • Harrington RA
        • Stone GW
        • McNulty S
        • et al.
        Platelet inhibition with cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 2318-2329
        • Bhatt DL
        • Stone GW
        • Mahaffey KW
        • et al.
        Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1303-1313
        • Steg PG
        • Bhatt DL
        • Hamm CW
        • et al.
        Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data.
        Lancet. 2013; 382: 1981-1992
        • Montalescot G
        • Barragan P
        • Wittenberg O
        • et al.
        Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 1895-1903
      2. Effects of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with tirofiban on adverse cardiac events in patients with unstable angina or acute myocardial infarction undergoing coronary angioplasty. The RESTORE Investigators. Randomized Efficacy Study of Tirofiban for Outcomes and REstenosis.
        Circulation. 1997; 6: 1445-1453
        • Valgimigli M
        • Campo G
        • Percoco G
        • et al.
        Comparison of angioplasty with infusion of tirofiban or abciximab and with implantation of sirolimus-eluting or uncoated stents for acute myocardial infarction: the MULTISTRATEGY randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 1788-1799
        • Ohman EM
        • Kleiman NS
        • Gacioch G
        • et al.
        Combined accelerated tissue-plasminogen activator and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin receptor blockade with Integrilin in acute myocardial infarction. Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. IMPACT-AMI Investigators.
        Circulation. 1997; 95: 846-854
        • El Khoury C
        • Dubien P-V
        • Mercier C
        • et al.
        Prehospital high-dose tirofiban in patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention. The AGIR-2 study.
        Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2010; 103: 285-292
        • Gibson CM
        • Kirtane AJ
        • Murphy SA
        • et al.
        Early initiation of eptifibatide in the emergency department before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the Time to Integrilin Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (TITAN)-TIMI 34 trial.
        Am Heart J. 2006; 152: 668-675
        • Akerblom A
        • James SK
        • Koutozis M
        • et al.
        Eptifibatide is noninferior to abciximab in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the SCAAR (Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry).
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 470-475
        • Gu YL
        • Kampinga MA
        • Wieringa WG
        • et al.
        Intracoronary versus intravenous administration of abciximab in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with thrombus aspiration: the comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab administration during emergency reperfusion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (CICERO) trial.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: 2709-2717
        • Bhatt DL
        • Lincoff M
        • Gibson CM
        • et al.
        Intravenous platelet blockade with cangrelor during PCI.
        N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 2330-2341
        • Franchi F
        • Rollini F
        • Rivas A
        • et al.
        Platelet inhibition with cangrelor and crushed ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Circulation. 2019; 139: 1661-1670
        • Grimfjärd P
        • Lagerqvist B
        • Erlinge D
        • Varenhorst C
        • James S
        Clinical use of cangrelor: nationwide experience from the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR).
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019; 5: 151-157
        • Coller BS
        Platelet GPIIb/IIIa antagonists: the first anti-integrin receptor therapeutics.
        J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 1467-1471
        • Coller BS
        • Shattil SJ
        The GPIIb/IIIa (integrin alphaIIbbeta3) odyssey: a technology-driven saga of a receptor with twists, turns, and even a bend.
        Blood. 2008; 112: 3011-3025
        • Gurm HS
        • Tamhane U
        • Meier P
        • Grossman PM
        • Chetcuti S
        • Bates ER
        A comparison of abciximab and small-molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
        Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2: 230-236
        • Kereiakes DJ
        • Kleiman NS
        • Ambrose J
        • et al.
        Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of tirofiban (MK-383) platelet IIb/IIIa blockade in high risk patients undergoing coronary angioplasty.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 536-542
        • Harrington RA
        • Kleiman NS
        • Kottke-Marchant K
        • et al.
        Immediate and reversible platelet inhibition after intravenous administration of a peptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor during percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Am J Cardiol. 1995; 76: 1222-1227
        • Neumann FJ
        • Hochholzer W
        • Pogatsa-Murray G
        • Schömig A
        • Gawaz M
        Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 37: 1323-1328
        • Keeley EC
        • Boura JA
        • Grines CL
        Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials.
        Lancet. 2006; 367: 579-588
        • Montalescot G
        • Borentain M
        • Payot L
        • Collet JP
        • Thomas D
        Early vs late administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis.
        JAMA. 2004; 292: 362-366
        • De Luca G
        • Suryapranata H
        • Stone GW
        • et al.
        Abciximab as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 1759-1765
        • Montalescot G
        • Antoniucci D
        • Kastrati A
        • et al.
        Abciximab in primary coronary stenting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a European meta-analysis on individual patients' data with long-term follow-up.
        Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 443-449
        • Maioli M
        • Bellandi F
        • Leoncini M
        • Toso A
        • Dabizzi RP
        Randomized early versus late abciximab in acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention (RELAx-AMI Trial).
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1517-1524
        • Van't Hof AW
        • Ten Berg J
        • Heestermans T
        • et al.
        Prehospital initiation of tirofiban in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty (On-TIME 2): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2008; 372: 537-546
        • Ellis SG
        • Armstrong P
        • Betriu A
        • et al.
        Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events (FINESSE) trial.
        Am Heart J. 2004; 147: E16
        • Ellis SG
        • Tendera M
        • de Belder MA
        • et al.
        1-year survival in a randomized trial of facilitated reperfusion: results from the FINESSE (Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events) trial.
        JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2: 909-916
        • ten Berg JM
        • van ‘t Hof AW
        • Heestermans DT
        • et al.
        Effect of early, pre-hospital initiation of high bolus dose tirofiban in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on short- and long-term clinical outcome.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 2446-2455
        • Brener SJ
        • Barr LA
        • Burchenal JE
        • et al.
        Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. ReoPro and Primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators.
        Circulation. 1998; 98: 734-741
        • Stone GW
        • Grines CL
        • Cox DA
        • et al.
        Comparison of angioplasty with stenting, with or without abciximab, in acute myocardial infarction.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 957-966
        • Zeymer U
        • Zahn R
        • Schiele R
        • et al.
        Early eptifibatide improves TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized integrilin in acute myocardial infarction (INTAMI) pilot trial.
        Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1971-1977
        • Shimada YJ
        • Nakra NC
        • Fox JT
        • Kanei Y
        Meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary versus intravenous abciximab in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
        Am J Cardiol. 2012; 109: 624-628
        • Stone GW
        • Maehara A
        • Witzenbichler B
        • et al.
        Intracoronary abciximab and aspiration thrombectomy in patients with large anterior myocardial infarction: the INFUSE-AMI randomized trial.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 1817-1826
        • Thiele H
        • Wöhrle J
        • Hambrecht R
        • et al.
        Intracoronary versus intravenous bolus abciximab during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 923-931
        • Wang Y
        • Wu B
        • Shu X
        Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing intracoronary and intravenous administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
        Am J Cardiol. 2012; 109: 1124-1130
        • Iversen A
        • Galatius S
        • Jensen JS
        The optimal route of administration of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention; intravenous versus intracoronary.
        Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008; 4: 293-299
        • Bellandi F
        • Maioli M
        • Gallopin M
        • Toso A
        • Dabizzi RP
        Increase of myocardial salvage and left ventricular function recovery with intracoronary abciximab downstream of the coronary occlusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 62: 186-192
        • Kakkar AK
        • Moutstapha A
        • Hanley HG
        • et al.
        Comparison of intracoronary vs. intravenous administration of abciximab in coronary stenting.
        Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 61: 31-34
        • Romagnoli E
        • Burzotta F
        • Trani C
        • et al.
        Angiographic evaluation of the effect of intracoronary abciximab administration in patients undergoing urgent PCI.
        Int J Cardiol. 2005; 105: 250-255
        • Wöhrle J
        • Grebe OC
        • Nusser T
        • et al.
        Reduction of major adverse cardiac events with intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus application of abciximab in patients with acute myocardial infarction or unstable angina undergoing coronary angioplasty.
        Circulation. 2003; 107: 1840-1843
        • Bertrand OF
        • Rodés-Cabau J
        • Larose E
        • et al.
        Intracoronary compared to intravenous Abciximab and high-dose bolus compared to standard dose in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a two-by-two factorial placebo-controlled randomized study.
        Am J Cardiol. 2010; 105: 1520-1527
        • Mehilli J
        • Kastrati A
        • Schulz S
        • et al.
        Abciximab in patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention after clopidogrel loading: a randomized double-blind trial.
        Circulation. 2009; 119: 1933-1940